<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 32bit or 64bit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zen.org/2005/06/14/32bit-or-64bit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zen.org/2005/06/14/32bit-or-64bit/</link>
	<description>The thoughts, ideas, habits, and interests of a sub-culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:11:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.zen.org/2005/06/14/32bit-or-64bit/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zen.org/?p=334#comment-943</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hearing 32-bit at the moment, but presumably 64-bit later; the big issue seems to be &quot;computrons per watt&quot;, and none of the Intel 64-bit chips (Itanium or EM64T) are terribly good on those numbers.

I expect to see Intel-based portables as some of the first shipping x86 Macs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hearing 32-bit at the moment, but presumably 64-bit later; the big issue seems to be &#8220;computrons per watt&#8221;, and none of the Intel 64-bit chips (Itanium or EM64T) are terribly good on those numbers.</p>
<p>I expect to see Intel-based portables as some of the first shipping x86 Macs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

